Proofread and improve the whole class reference

- Document a few more properties and methods
- Add more information to many classes
- Fix lots of typos and gramar mistakes
- Use [code] tags for parameters consistently
- Use [b] and [i] tags consistently
- Put "Warning:" and "Note:" on their own line to be more visible,
  and make them always bold
- Tweak formatting in code examples to be more readable
- Use double quotes consistently
- Add more links to third-party technologies
This commit is contained in:
Hugo Locurcio
2019-06-22 01:04:47 +02:00
parent 538c8eec15
commit f7f6115f76
330 changed files with 2585 additions and 2474 deletions

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
</brief_description>
<description>
This node takes its parent [Path2D], and returns the coordinates of a point within it, given a distance from the first vertex.
It is useful for making other nodes follow a path, without coding the movement pattern. For that, the nodes must be descendants of this node. Then, when setting an offset in this node, the descendant nodes will move accordingly.
It is useful for making other nodes follow a path, without coding the movement pattern. For that, the nodes must be children of this node. The descendant nodes will then move accordingly when setting an offset in this node.
</description>
<tutorials>
</tutorials>
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
<member name="cubic_interp" type="bool" setter="set_cubic_interpolation" getter="get_cubic_interpolation">
If [code]true[/code], the position between two cached points is interpolated cubically, and linearly otherwise.
The points along the [Curve2D] of the [Path2D] are precomputed before use, for faster calculations. The point at the requested offset is then calculated interpolating between two adjacent cached points. This may present a problem if the curve makes sharp turns, as the cached points may not follow the curve closely enough.
There are two answers to this problem: Either increase the number of cached points and increase memory consumption, or make a cubic interpolation between two points at the cost of (slightly) slower calculations.
There are two answers to this problem: either increase the number of cached points and increase memory consumption, or make a cubic interpolation between two points at the cost of (slightly) slower calculations.
</member>
<member name="h_offset" type="float" setter="set_h_offset" getter="get_h_offset">
The node's offset along the curve.