Fix code style and consistency of RWLock and Semaphore

core/os/rw_lock.h

@@ -31,39 +31,41 @@
 #ifndef RW_LOCK_H
 #define RW_LOCK_H
 
+#include "core/typedefs.h"
+
 #include <shared_mutex>
 
 class RWLock {
 	mutable std::shared_timed_mutex mutex;
 
 public:
-	// Lock the rwlock, block if locked by someone else
-	void read_lock() const {
+	// Lock the RWLock, block if locked by someone else.
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ void read_lock() const {
 		mutex.lock_shared();
 	}
 
-	// Unlock the rwlock, let other threads continue
-	void read_unlock() const {
+	// Unlock the RWLock, let other threads continue.
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ void read_unlock() const {
 		mutex.unlock_shared();
 	}
 
 	// Attempt to lock the RWLock for reading. True on success, false means it can't lock.
-	bool read_try_lock() const {
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ bool read_try_lock() const {
 		return mutex.try_lock_shared();
 	}
 
-	// Lock the rwlock, block if locked by someone else
-	void write_lock() {
+	// Lock the RWLock, block if locked by someone else.
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ void write_lock() {
 		mutex.lock();
 	}
 
-	// Unlock the rwlock, let other thwrites continue
-	void write_unlock() {
+	// Unlock the RWLock, let other threads continue.
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ void write_unlock() {
 		mutex.unlock();
 	}
 
 	// Attempt to lock the RWLock for writing. True on success, false means it can't lock.
-	bool write_try_lock() {
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ bool write_try_lock() {
 		return mutex.try_lock();
 	}
 };
@@ -72,11 +74,11 @@ class RWLockRead {
 	const RWLock &lock;
 
 public:
-	RWLockRead(const RWLock &p_lock) :
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ RWLockRead(const RWLock &p_lock) :
 			lock(p_lock) {
 		lock.read_lock();
 	}
-	~RWLockRead() {
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ ~RWLockRead() {
 		lock.read_unlock();
 	}
 };
@@ -85,11 +87,11 @@ class RWLockWrite {
 	RWLock &lock;
 
 public:
-	RWLockWrite(RWLock &p_lock) :
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ RWLockWrite(RWLock &p_lock) :
 			lock(p_lock) {
 		lock.write_lock();
 	}
-	~RWLockWrite() {
+	_ALWAYS_INLINE_ ~RWLockWrite() {
 		lock.write_unlock();
 	}
 };