Review and merge process ======================== .. note:: This page is intended to provide insight into the pull request (PR) review process that we aspire to. As such, it is primarily targeted at engine maintainers who are responsible for reviewing and approving pull requests. That being said, much of the content is useful for prospective contributors wanting to know how to ensure that their PR is merged. From a high level, the ideal life cycle of a pull request looks like the following: 1. A contributor opens a PR that fixes a specific problem (optimally closing a GitHub `issue `_ or implementing a `proposal `_). 2. Other contributors provide feedback on the PR (including reviewing and/or approving the PR, as appropriate). 3. An engine maintainer reviews the code and provides feedback, requests changes, or approves the pull request, as appropriate. 4. Another maintainer reviews the code with a focus on code style/clarity and approves it once satisfied. 5. A team leader or a member of the `production team `_ merges the pull request if satisfied that it has been sufficiently reviewed. This document will explain steps 2, 3, 4, and 5 in more detail. For a more detailed explanation of the pull request workflow please see the :ref:`pull request workflow document `. .. note:: In practice these steps may blend together. Oftentimes maintainers will provide comments on code style and code quality at the same time and will approve a pull request for both. Typically the first interaction on a pull request will be an engine maintainer assigning tags to the pull request and flagging it for review by someone familiar with that area of code. Engine maintainers are folks who are "members" of the Godot project repository on GitHub and/or are listed on the `Teams page `_ on the Godot website. Maintainers are responsible for a given area of the engine. Typically this means they are the people who are given more trust to approve and recommend pull requests for merging. Even if you are not a maintainer, you can still help by reviewing code, providing feedback on PRs and testing PRs locally on your machine to confirm that they work as intended. Many of the currently active maintainers started out doing this before they became maintainers. When will a pull request get reviewed? -------------------------------------- When you open a new pull request, :ref:`Area maintainers ` are notified immediately. However, a lot of pull requests are opened every day, so reviews can take a while to come in. Going by historical data, you can expect the following review timelines: - 80% of **regression fixes** are merged (or rejected) within **a week**. - 80% of **bug fixes** are merged (or rejected) within **two weeks**. - 80% of **enhancements** are merged (or rejected) within **two months**. As you can imagine, simple pull requests will usually be reviewed more quickly than large and complicated pull requests. If you think your pull request has been overlooked, feel free to ask about it in the `Contributors' chat `__. You can ask in `#new-contributors `__, `#devel `__, or the channel of the :ref:`area ` you're expecting reviews from.