From 20b9cb318fb661bfef17e25bd41f97bfd71fccf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Tenbrink Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 11:07:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Mention 'relevant' in pr workflow timeline. --- pull_requests/pr_workflow.rst | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pull_requests/pr_workflow.rst b/pull_requests/pr_workflow.rst index 7a431b3..7f7df41 100644 --- a/pull_requests/pr_workflow.rst +++ b/pull_requests/pr_workflow.rst @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ you can expect the following review timelines: - 80% of **bug fixes** are merged (or rejected) within **two weeks**. - 80% of **enhancements** are merged (or rejected) within **two months**. -As you can imagine, simple pull requests will usually be reviewed more quickly than large and complicated pull requests. +As you can imagine, simple and relevant pull requests will usually be reviewed more quickly than large and complicated +pull requests. How quickly a PR gets reviewed or merged also depends on where in the release cycle we are currently in: